She is worth so much more than a number,

but that is the oppressive educational power

structure – one number determines all and

isn’t that so typically an academically smug

generational assertion – one # answers all? 

Stanford-Binet was the answer when it

was developed about hundred years or so

ago in light of the history of humanity now

going back to a million and counting and

push forward a hundred years or so and

wouldn’t it be nice if the pros figured out

a way to account for and measure little old

intuition, that frisky little, but ever so important,

ingredient in intelligence, and it’s not even 

restricted to women as in women’s intuition,

not to mention its first cousin music which is

gender neutral, too?