The Boston bombing was bad,
really bad, but anymore bad
than the hundreds who died
in West, Texas from a fertilizer
explosion, not a terrorist’s bomb
(if only it had been a terrorist attack,
what a story that would have made,
even better and bigger than Boston)
– a story that played second fiddle
to Boston, any worse (to be more
grammatically correct) than all
the deaths on American highways
during the same period of time
devoted to media coverage of
Boston with all the talking heads
talking their heads off, any worse
than all the deaths from gun fire
on American streets during the
same period of time devoted to
Boston or any worse than all the
innumerable (undocumented, un-
known) lives lost world-wide
during the same period of time
devoted to Boston by all our
covert wars, not to mention
Afghanistan, one more
tired, tired-out time – the bombs,
drone strikes, assault rifle fire,
killing, death, destruction, mayhem,
who knows and who cares as long
as the market approaches fifteen
thousand and rising? And that doesn’t
even touch the unnecessary deaths
which occurred during that time devoted
to Boston in those institutions
dedicated to health and happiness –
your friendly, local hospital. But
Boston was all about patriotism
(It isn’t by accident a team is the
Boston Patriots). Are you kidding?
The scenario couldn’t have been
any better, to strike a cynical note.
Boston, terrorist attack, bravado,
Boston tough, Boston media bull.
“When will they ever learn?
When will they ever learn?”
Outstanding stuff … ya’, the media loves such stuff … and it gives Americans a chance to “know how tough we are,” and how bad others are – that so many others died tragically is hardly newsworthy when we find something else to crow about. Anyway, thanks … I’ve shared via Twitter.
I read this like the the one in which your friend chose the only right comment to your pain:
“I’m sorry.”
Why do thousands follow a murder case for 7 weeks, or the terrorists for 72 hours straight?