Thoughts on the Present Political Situation in No Particular Order

Thoughts on the present political situation in no particular order:

They are trying a last-ditch effort to keep
the power in the hands of the angry, aging,
decreasing white population.

They are trying to reverse everything
President Obama accomplished on behalf
of the American public during his eight
years in office.

They are entering uncharted territory
in international conflicts with potentially
disastrous, including nuclear, results.

They are trying to give the top 1% of the
economically advantaged even more money
at the expense of the middle class and
poor.

They are backing off on school loan
leniency, attempting to apply severe
penalties and trying to eliminate federal
grants.

They are trying to cut the federal education
budget while they are trying to get federal
funding for private school education, which
is smoke and mirrors for trying to bring back
racist segregated/separate but unequal education.

They are deporting people for small
traffic violations.

They are restricting the immigration of
people based on religion.

They are sending the dreamers back to Mexico.

They are trying to throw twenty-some
million people off health care.

They are trying to send Medicaid recipients
back to emergency rooms as the only way
to stay alive at an enormous expense to
all those who are fortunate enough to
have insurance, thus skyrocketing their
premiums.

They are rescinding LGBT rights.

They are pulling back on women’s rights.

And so unbelievably, hugely significant,
they are eliminating environmental
regulations which affect all life on
planet earth.

They are backing off of regulations on
banks which will create conditions
for another economic bubble which
when it breaks, as it surely will,
will plunge us into another economic
recession to challenge that of the
Great Depression not unlike the 2008
recession, which Obama helped us avoid.

(Space for adding your own thoughts)

And why?

Because you, whoever you are, couldn’t
be bothered to vote in the fragile
democratic institution completely
dependent on our votes to survive.

Because you didn’t vote because Bernie
wasn’t on the ticket and you were mad
at the establishment.

Because you voted your conscience as
an environmentally concerned person
by voting for the Green Party candidate
who didn’t have a ghost of a chance of
winning, but you were going to make a
statement come hell or high water,
both of which have now come about
politically and as the planet warms.

Because the Green Party candidate had
too much ego involved in the election
to see, excuse the pun, the forest for
the trees, and if she had withdrawn,
would have guaranteed the election
to the person who still would have
done things to help the environment
instead of the one who is doing every-
thing to further damage the environment.

(Space for adding your own thoughts)

Bob

Belief, Faith and the Persistent Resistance to Change

The terms belief and faith are often used synonymously. Yet they are very different. As David Benner says, “Belief is conviction of the trustworthiness of a proposition . . . . Faith, on the other hand, can never be reduced to beliefs or thoughts. . . . Beliefs are often simply objects of attachment that provide a misleading sense of certainty.” Faith welcomes unknowing and mystery. Unfortunately, Christianity has settled for dogma, rituals, and tribal belonging, losing sight of the transformative way of faith.

As I read the above words in today’s meditation by Richard Rohr, I thought about the congregations I served over the years as the installed pastor. I was good at promoting the “dogma, rituals and tribal belonging.” The resulting numbers reflected that success. The end of year statistics were mostly encouraging to the powers that be and I usually received a nice Christmas present from the congregation for my effort.

What I wasn’t so good at was what I should have been good at — encouraging the “transformative way of faith — welcoming unknowing and mystery.”

Such faithfulness on my part would have led in one of two directions. Either I would have been fired by a congregation too frightened to step out for any number of reasons not the least of which would be because such stepping out might threaten the numbers and contributions for tribal survival or I would have been part of group contemplation and meditation into the wonder of life’s mysteries and exploration and practice by that group of following Jesus into acts of justice, mercy and compassion.

Unfortunately, I was pretty good at carrying out all the things I was taught needed to be done if I were to receive the “laying on of hands” approval by the institution to do those things needed to keep the institution going.

I functioned well in a particular belief system. I helped keep the boat afloat rather than challenging the oikoumene (World Council of Churches’ symbol for the church is a group of people in a boat on rough waters) to jump ship and walk, in faith, on the water toward Jesus.

One additional thought, this on the persistent survivability of the institution as status quo and resistance to change. When I did preach prophetically which, if truth be told, was often, the congregation, ironically, would affirm such preaching and use it as a form of personal penance and propitiation rather than group transformation.

Sometimes I would hear, “You really stepped on some toes today, preacher.” They heard the message as judgment rather than an opportunity to follow more closely in the steps of Jesus. Then having been suitably chastised, the parishioners would go out to lunch and then home to football or golf on TV and life as usual.

Life Has a Way of Intruding

The wind blows through the pine trees.
The water rushes over the rocks.
The fish chase each other around the pond.
The sun bounces off the flowers.
The dog sneaks off to the neighbor’s yard
to do his business, which I will have to
pick up with a non-biodegradable poop bag
because biodegradable poop bags are hard to
find thus resulting in everlasting poop life
in a landfill. I will put the bag in the
garbage which won’t be picked up until the
following Thursday and it is only Saturday
so the garbage will smell really bad by then.
It was supposed to be a serene scene evoking
the feel of a Japanese poem. Ah, life.

Some People Are Really Slow Learners

Abruptly, suddenly, like the
snap of his fingers, his lifestyle
took a turn from fun, exercise,

enjoyment of the great out-of-doors,
to being a lonely life in a chair
with little movement because every

step was excruciatingly painful.
He hobbled a few steps to the bath-
room; he hobbled to the spare bed-

room because there was no way he
could make it down the steps to
the master bedroom. He had become

an old, old man or what he imagined
it felt like to be an old, old man
because of an incapacitation brought

on by his own stupidity. He over
estimated his ability to do what he
hoped would be another fun, physical

challenge and he wrenched his knee
and strained some muscles. The
school of hard knocks kicked him

in the butt and he wound up feeling
like he was flunking life. A friend
uttered the words he has heard many

times before (including the time
he broke thirteen bones in a mount-
ain biking accident and slept for

three months in an ugly but incredibly
comfortable Lazy Boy) and hates almost
as much as the pain: “Time to act your

age.” To which he mumbled under his
breath as he grabbed his crutches,
“We’ll see about that.”

From Whence Do They Come?

In as much as neither Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos nor her brother Erik, former owner and CEO of Blackwater, a controversial private military contractor now under a different name, has made public any personal faith statements, the following is part of an attempt to understand their thinking by examining historic and recent religious influences which may have informed and shaped their thinking:

Ms. DeVos and her brother were born and grew up in Holland, MI. (also my home) and were educated in the Calvinist parochial schools of the Christian Reformed Church, a sister denomination to the other dominant denomination in the area, the Reformed Church in America.

Albertus Van Raalte was a secessionist from the state church, the Dutch Reformed Church in the Netherlands, who emigrated from the Netherlands to the United States to establish a Christian community and became the founder of the Dutch settlement in 1847 along the shores of Lake Michigan known as Holland, Michigan.

Van Raalte held to a strict interpretation of Calvinism particularly on providence and sovereignty. Van Raalte’s view was that the community of Holland should reflect the will of God and that Van Raalte and his fellow travelers were the elect chosen by God to live out that divine will, and who better to guide and implement that undertaking than Reverend Van Raalte himself?

He was an advocate of the separation of church and state but believed the state should reflect Christian principles. Van Raalte supported Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War and the community has remained a strong Republican enclave ever since, even as the Republican Party has gone through many metamorphoses since its founding under the leadership of Abraham Lincoln.

Abraham Kuyper ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Kuyper) has to be considered as an influential person on Christian Reformed views and therefore, one would assume, the belief systems of Betsy DeVos and her brother Erik Prince. In contrast, Kuyper remains an insignificant figure in the Calvinism of the Reformed Church in America.

Kuyper was a brilliant, albeit complex clergyperson, diplomat and politician during the late 1800’s and early 1900’s in the Netherlands and a contradictory figure in some ways: he was for separation of church and state but for equal funding of Christian schools and public schools by the secular state. While he would not have been an advocate of mandating a Christian theocracy, apparently he was an advocate of a Christian worldview in all matters.

My late wife Doris had a professor of philosophy at Trinity Christian College (an independent, baccalaureate granting religious school with strong ties to the Christian Reformed Church), during its infant days as a two-year school in a Chicago suburb, who was a disciple of Kuyper and philosopher Herman Dooyeweerd (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herman_Dooyeweerd). Her teacher espoused the Kuyperian /Dooyeweerdian idea of viewing all of life as a Christian enterprise and from a Christian perspective. All academic disciplines were to be thought of as Christian and studied from a Christian perspective: science, medicine, politics, education, art, philosophy, business, etc.

Dooyeweerd believed that there are basic assumptions underlying any examination and study and that these assumptions provide the underlying “ground of meaning” to the study and all underlying assumptions are religious in nature. He advocated for a “creation, fall, redemption” assumption to engage other thinking based on other religious assumptions — Greek, Medieval, Humanist, etc.

I don’t know that Dooyeweerd ever advocated for the imposition of Christianity on everything as he did the study of everything from the perspective of his underlying assumption (ground of meaning), the construct “creation, fall, redemption.”

Then there is the interesting notion developed in the 1960’s of the imposition and enforcement of Old Testament law upon the state as in the theonomy and Christian Reconstructionsim (a branch of Dominionism) of Rousas Rushdoony, an Orthodox Presbyterian and strict Calvinist, who advocated against pluralism and diversity. He is credited with being the “Father of Homeschooling.” One source labeled Rushdoony a racist and bigot (http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/05/r-j-rushdoony-reconstructionist-and-racist-bigot/).

Dominionism (including Rushdoony’s Christian Reconstructionism) has a close connection with the Christian right with which Ms. DeVos and her brother Erik would have intimate knowledge, their late father Edgar having been a significant financial contributor and ardent supporter of James Dobson’s Focus on the Family.

Here are excerpts from Wikipedia on Dominionism and its relation to the Christian Right:

Journalist Frederick Clarkson defined dominionism as a movement that, while including Dominion Theology and Reconstructionism as subsets, is much broader in scope, extending to much of the Christian Right in the United States.

In his 1992 study of Dominion Theology and its influence on the Christian Right, Bruce Barron writes, “In the context of American evangelical efforts to penetrate and transform public life, the distinguishing mark of a dominionist is a commitment to defining and carrying out an approach to building society that is self-consciously defined as exclusively Christian, and dependent specifically on the work of Christians, rather than based on a broader consensus.”

In 1995, Diamond called the influence of Dominion Theology “prevalent on the Christian Right.”

Journalist Chip Berlet added in 1998 that, although they represent different theological and political ideas, dominionists assert a Christian duty to take “control of a sinful secular society.”

In 2005, Clarkson enumerated the following characteristics shared by all forms of dominionism:
1. Dominionists celebrate Christian nationalism, in that they believe that the United States once was, and should once again be, a Christian nation. In this way, they deny the Enlightenment roots of American democracy.
2. Dominionists promote religious supremacy, insofar as they generally do not respect the equality of other religions, or even other versions of Christianity.
3. Dominionists endorse theocratic visions, insofar as they believe that the Ten Commandments, or “biblical law,” should be the foundation of American law, and that the U.S. Constitution should be seen as a vehicle for implementing Biblical principles.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_Theology.)

Dominionism equates to domination which requires coercive power (political, military) to enforce Old Testament law against subjugated peoples resulting in the elimination of democratically based freedoms guaranteed in the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution, and a society devoid of justice, peace, compassion, inclusivity, universality and all this enforced in the name of Jesus.

And so, somehow, John Calvin, Post-Calvin Scholasticism, Albertus Van Raalte, Abraham Kuyper, Herman Dooyeweerd, Hyper-Calvinism, Cornelius Van Til, R. J. Rushdoony, postmillennialism, fundamentalist eschatology, the Christian Right and the misbegotten theological mishmash known as Dominionism, a very real threat to our Republican form of democracy when coupled with totalitarianism are all in some way, perhaps, informative of Betsy DeVos and her brother Erik’s worldview.

As the hapless kid in the insurance commercial about a couple of kids getting a flat tire at night on a lonely stretch of highway responds to his buddy’s question, “Is this a lug wrench?” — “Maybe.”

Maybe the Betsy DeVos/Erik Prince worldview is about enforcing (by whatever means) a Christian state in preparation for the return of Christ.  I can’t say for sure because they aren’t saying, but there are significant religious influences upon them and sign posts from their own behavior to consider making something more than just an educated guess.

The merger of political power with weird, theological literalism and absolute certainty is indeed scary and something against which to protest peacefully in the tradition of Dorothy Day, Gandhi and M.L.King, Jr. and, for me, also in the name of  The Compassionate Servant To All who shows us the inclusive, universal love of God — Jesus.

The Trade Off

He feels the acute pain in muscles
around his left knee extending down

his calf and up his IT band and has
decided that all the pain is worth it

given that when he, in hind sight,
regretfully decided to climb the

steep hill on his bicycle he passed
the house of two incredibly

competitive cyclists who happened
to be sitting on their deck eating

dinner with a clear view of the hill.
With them in mind, he couldn’t just

stop half way up the hill, climb off
his bike and walk it back down the

hill in front of the super competitive
couple. He made it to the top of

the steep hill well out of sight of
the competitive couple enjoying

dinner on their back deck. He
huffed and puffed and almost

fainted before turning around,
holding tight to the brakes on

his way back down the hill
purposely not acknowledge-

ing the presence of the couple.
The pain started the next day

and as acute as it is, it isn’t
anything compared to the pain

that would have been inflicted
on his ego if he had walked down.

Gatsby, Bonfire of the Vanities and the Would-Be Masters of the Universe

The following is a terrific piece of writing about “careless” people:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-jr-sub-master-universe-090031185.html.

I have a “careless” neighbor not unlike the characters in Gatsby and Bonfire. He believes rules are for others.

Twice he has endangered me, wife Chris and our chocolate lab Buddy Baloo by “carelessly” driving his BMW SUV (to go with his BMW sedan and BMW sports car) right up against the bumper of our car, passing in a no passing zone and speeding (I use the term loosely) around a no passing curve — twice!

The second time was with a cyclist in front of us. Neither time did he know who the driver was he passed so it wasn’t personal and I don’t think it would have made any difference if he did know. It just was. It just was complete carelessness redux.

After the second time, I lost my cool, stood on the street in front of his house as he and his wife were unloading groceries and cussed him out. He didn’t care. His wife laughed at me. That’s the whole point. He doesn’t care. She doesn’t care. They don’t care.

I reported both incidents to a sheriff’s deputy and he told me that if it happens again, document it and call the deputy but under no circumstances confront the neighbor again.

I regret losing my cool. I succumbed to co-dependency where I let another person’s action, influence or determine my action, reaction, response instead of self-determining.

This guy’s next door neighbor (a former parishioner of mine) lost his cool when this “careless” neighbor wouldn’t stop blowing grass cuttings off his yard on a Sunday afternoon, a routine, two-hour occurrence. My former parishioner asked him three times to please stop. The “careless” neighbor put him off by saying it would be just a few more minutes and then kept right on blowing grass and polluting the neighborhood with gas fumes and noise. Finally my parishioner lost his cool and yelled at the “careless” neighbor.

Didn’t do much good. The guy still blows grass and leaves depending on the season regularly for two hours on Sunday afternoons.

Yelling at “careless” people doesn’t work.  Because? Right. They don’t care.

My former parishioner regrets losing his cool, too.

We allowed this “careless” person’s behavior to determine our own less than appropriate response.

I think we are a nation of citizens of growing anxiety and the attending anger at the utter, total “carelessness” of the family in the White House and the permission this president gives by example for others to act “carelessly,” as well.

Aarrgghh!

I can only gather, somewhat optimistically, along with the author of the article that the “Masters and Sub-Masters of the Universe” are now in way over their heads.

Bob

 

He Decided to Leave

He decided to leave meter and rhyme
For a time
And concentrate on free verse with
Metaphor, simile
And nothing more.
And there he went again,
Doing what he said he would leave
Behind.
His brain is like Big Ben
Moving in circles of a linear time line –
Chiming at three, six and nine,
And at twelve the last quarter of the Westminster chime
And the chiming of the hour, one at a time,
And only a single, lonely simile
And not a metaphor anywhere to see
This time,
But hopefully next time
And definitely without meter and rhyme.
Tick, tock, tick, tock
Goes the venerable London clock
Doing over and over, only that for which
It was designed —
Moving in circles of a linear time line.
Some habits are hard to break.

He Saw A Former Dean

He saw a former dean of his former
seminary — now the president of
another seminary, in town for a
vacation along the shores of the Big
Lake. She is a first-rate scholar but
being profoundly left brained, she
didn’t know him even though they
had been introduced several times.
No insult taken. It’s all about
the brain. It just goes with the
academic territory — like they
will explore the meaning of Jesus’
words as much as they can identify
them and challenge students to live
those words intimately even if those
professors remain miles away in a
library somewhere, safe and sound
and incredibly comfortable in their
academic security while one of them
has a really nice, comfortable
vacation along the shore of the Big
Lake before going back to her seminary
to challenge students to go out to
follow Jesus to comfort the poor
and destitute.